Keywords
organization
innovation system
technological change
crossing boundary
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper studies the paradigmatic shift as the effect on the crossing organizational boundaries activities. Boundary crossing as part of specific function of organizations is common to organization theories. Nevertheless, the increasing and strong rate of occurrence of the crossing boundary activities is considered important today as the consequence of the technological revolution in information and communication technology coupled with the future technologies. Crossing boundaries influence the people involved and the institutional sets. The relationships within the boundaries are increasingly dynamic. Hence, this, in turn, may lead to paradigmatic shift. From the perspective of organization and innovation studies these processes are to a great extent attractive since they may create different conditions the existing literatures on organization as well as innovation, and consequently, on marketing. Therefore, this paper aims at studying the marketing strategy response of an organization by identifyingstates that emerge or condition that may be created as the paradigms shifted.
References
Bach, Laurent, & Matt, Mireille. (2005). From Economic Foundations to S&T Policy Tools: a Comparative Analysis of the Dominant Paradigms. In P. Llrena & M. Matt (Eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Heidelberg: Springer.
Cepeda-Carrion, Ignacio, Martelo-Landroguez, Silvia, Leal-Rodriguez, Antonio L., & Leal-Millán, Antonio. (2016). Critical processes of knowledge management: An approach towardthe creation of customer value. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.03.001
Cohendet, Patrick, & Mehyer-Krahmer, Frieder. (2005). Technology Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy. In P. Llrena & M. Matt (Eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Heidelberg: Springer.
Dickinson, Harley D. (2013). Crossing Boundaries: Creating, Transferring and Using Knowledge. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge, and Society (pp. 145-165). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Dodgson, Mark, Gann, David, & Salter, Ammon. (2008). The Management of Technological Innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dzisah, James, & Etzkowitz, Henry. (2013a). The Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge and Society. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge and Society (pp. 1-7). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Dzisah, James, & Etzkowitz, Henry. (2013b). The Triple Helix of Knowledge. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge, and Society (pp. 127-144). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Dzisah, James, & Etzkowitz, Henry (Eds.). (2013c). The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge, and Society. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Edquist, Charles (Ed.). (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. New York: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, Henry. (2013). Normative Change in Science and the Birth of the Triple Helix. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge and Society (pp. 11-34). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Fischer, Manfred M., & Fröhlich, Josef (Eds.). (2001). Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
Hult, G. Tomas M., & Jr., David J. Ketchen. (2017). Disruptive marketing strategy. AMS Review, 7(1-2), 20-25. doi: 10.1007/s13162-017-0097-4
Keszey, Tamara, & Biemans, Wim. (2016). Sales–marketing encroachment effects on innovation. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3698-3706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.032
King, William R. (Ed.). (2009). Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. New York: Springer.
Kotler, Philip, & Armstrong, Gary. (2012). Principle of Marketing (14th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, Philip, & Keller, Kevin Lane. (2007). Manajemen Pemasaran (12 ed. Vol. 2). Indonesia: PT. Indek.
Llrena, Patrick, & Matt, Mireille (Eds.). (2005). Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy: Theory and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
Llrena, Patrick, & Schenk, Eric. (2005). Technology Policy and A-Synchronic Technologies: The Case of German High-Speed Trains. In P. Llrena & M. Matt (Eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Heidelberg: Springer.
Metcalfe, Amy Scott. (2013). Facilitating Knowledge Transfer: the Role of Intermediating Organization. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge, and Society (pp. 243-266). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Metcalfe, James Stanley. (2013). System Failure and the Case for Innovation Policy. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge, and Society (pp. 47-74). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Miles, Jeffrey A. (2012). Management and Organization Theory (First ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Orlandi, Ludovico Bullini. (2016). Organizational capabilities in the digital era: Reframing strategic orientation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(3), 156-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.002
Perez, Carlota. (2005). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: the Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Philips, Peter W. B. (2013). Governing Innovation in a Knowledge Society. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The Age of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Universities, Knowledge and Society (pp. 167-191). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Schwab, Klaus. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. Retrieved 10 July, 2017, from http://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond
Senge, Peter M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
Tidd, Joe, Bessant, John, & Pavitt, Keith (Eds.). (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (Third ed.). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Williams, Paul. (2010). Special Agents: The Nature and Role of Boundary Spanners. Paper presented at the Collaborative Futures: New Insights from Intra and Inter-Sectoral Collaborations, Birmingham. Paper retrieved from http://www.download.bham.ac.uk/govsoc/pdfs/special-agents-paper.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2019 Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review