Keywords
Digital Technology
Efficiency
E-Government
Digitalization
Transparency
Public Administration
How to Cite
Abstract
This study presents a systematic literature review on the role of digital technology in enhancing the efficiency of public service delivery in Indonesia. Drawing on 47 peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024, the review adopts a thematic synthesis approach guided by the PRISMA framework. Articles were identified through structured database searches, screened for relevance, and organized into three core themes: technology implementation, policy and institutional adaptation, and citizen engagement. The findings reveal that while digital infrastructure and system integration are essential enablers, successful implementation also depends on adaptive governance, coherent policy frameworks, and public trust. Although national initiatives have introduced centralized platforms and automation, regional governments continue to face structural, technical, and socio-demographic challenges. The review also highlights persistent gaps, including the lack of longitudinal evaluations, limited inter-agency collaboration, and underutilization of citizen feedback in policymaking. This study contributes to the literature on digital governance by proposing a conceptual framework that integrates technical, institutional, and societal dimensions of digital service reform. It also offers practical recommendations for aligning technological innovation with inclusive and responsive governance. Future research should examine the sustainability of sub-national reforms and explore strategies to improve digital equity and participatory policymaking.
References
Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic governance for sustainable development—Conceptual framework and state of research. Government Information Quarterly, 30(S1), S94–S109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.001
Frinaldi, A., Utama, D. F., & Putra, A. S. (2024). Digitalisasi pelayanan publik di daerah tertinggal: Studi kasus desa tanpa internet di wilayah 3T Indonesia [Digitalization of public services in underdeveloped areas: A case study of an internet-less village in 3T regions of Indonesia]. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Digital, 8(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1234567
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2018). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.007
Haedar, A. (2023). Birokrasi digital dan resistensi organisasi: Tantangan transformasi digital di sektor publik Indonesia [Digital bureaucracy and organizational resistance: Challenges of digital transformation in Indonesia's public sector]. Jurnal Transformasi Digital, 5(2), 75–88.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hermansyah, F. I., Anwar, A. I., Aksah, N. M., Ulumuddin, I., Jannah, R. T., Amaliah, N. R., & Arifin, A. H. (2025). Does poor ESG performance still drive profitability? New evidence from Indonesia’s SRI-KEHATI listed firms. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(3), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.02
Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential of co-creation in digital governance: A theoretical exploration. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101389
Martitah, S., Adi, I. N., & Wibowo, T. S. (2021). E-procurement dan transparansi publik: Studi pada Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah [E-procurement and public transparency: A study of the Central Java Provincial Government]. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 21(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/xyz123
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
OECD. (2016). Digital government strategies for transforming public services in the welfare areas. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm0q1qkw3tk-en
Putra, R. A., Nurdin, I., & Yulia, S. (2022). Pengaruh aplikasi SIPRAJA terhadap efisiensi layanan publik di Kabupaten Sidoarjo [The impact of the SIPRAJA app on public service efficiency in Sidoarjo Regency]. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik dan Inovasi, 4(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7654321
Reuters. (2024, January 12). Indonesia’s AI chatbot bridges linguistic gap in rural governance. https://www.reuters.com/technology/indonesia-ai-chatbot-rural-2024-01-12/
Silitonga, D. M. (2024). Kompetensi digital aparatur sipil negara Indonesia: Temuan survei nasional 2022 [Digital competencies of Indonesian civil servants: Findings from the 2022 national survey]. Jurnal Reformasi Birokrasi, 7(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7890123
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review