IDENTIFYING THE BEST DECENTRALIZED RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION IN NEPAL

Rana Bahadur Thapa, Bishnu Raj Upreti, Durga Devkota, Govind Raj Pokharel

Abstract


Access to electricity is generally recognized as an important factor for economic and social development. Moreover, the world energy consumption depends on the use of limited resources like fossil fuels that induce adverse impact on the environment and society. As an alternative, renewable energies turn into crucial alternative energy ensuring sustainable energy needs and taking care of society, economy and the environment. In order to combat such issues, the United Nations has declared universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy for by 2030. In many cases, different types of renewable energy systems are being developed to serve energy need without considering the best alternative. Thus, this paper tries to prioritize the installed Decentralized Renewable Energy (DRE) systems for rural electrification in Nepal by analyzing nineteen sustainability indicators related to four sustainability dimensions - technical, social, economic and environmental. An Analytical Hierarchy Process-Online Software (AHP-OS) model is used for ranking various DRE systems. Suitable goals, criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives are developed after reviewing pertinent literature and consultation of the experts. The results reveal that micro-hydropower is the best electrification option followed by the solar home system, solar mini-grid, and wind-solar hybrid for decentralized electrification in Nepal. Biomass is found to be the least prioritized alternative in Nepal. The outcome of the research can help the policy-makers and decision-makers in shaping energy policies, plans, and programs, and foster sustainable energy development in the country. Similarly, the relevant stakeholders will be benefited by improving their products and services in the future.

Keywords


Renewable energy system; Sustainability; Analytical hierarchy process; Decentralized

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abreu Kang, T. H., da Costa Soares Júnior, A. M., and de Almeida, A. T., 2018. Evaluating electric power generation technologies: A multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy, 165: 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy. Download 2018.09.165

AEPC, 2014. Reference Micro Hydro Power Standard. Kathmandu: Alternative Energy Promotion Centre.

AEPC, 2016. Piloting sustainability monitoring for micro hydro plants. Lalitpur.

AEPC, 2018a. Guidelines for Detailed Feasibility Studies of Micro-Hydro Projects. Kathmandu: Alternative Energy Promotion Centre.

AEPC, 2018b. Progress at a Glance: A Year in Review FY 2074/75. Lalitpur.

Afgan, N. H., and Carvalho, M. G., 2002. Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. Energy, 27(8): 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00019-1

Afgan, Nain H, and Carvalho, M. G., 2008. Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system. Energy Policy, 36(8): 2903–2910.

Al Garni, H., Kassem, A., Awasthi, A., Komljenovic, D., and Al-Haddad, K., 2016. A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 16: 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.05.006

Algarín, C. R., Llanos, A. P., and Castro, A. O., 2017. An analytic hierarchy process based approach for evaluating renewable energy sources. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4): 38–47.

Amer, M., and Daim, T. U., 2011. Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: A case of Pakistan. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4): 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.001

Barbier, E. B., 1987. The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development. Environmental Conservation, 14(2): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449

Bhandari, R., Saptalena, L. G., and Kusch, W., 2018. Sustainability assessment of a micro hydropower plant in Nepal. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0147-2

Bhattacharyya, S. C., 2012. Review of alternative methodologies for analysing off-grid electricity supply. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1): 677–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.033

Brent, A. C., and Rogers, D. E., 2010. Renewable rural electrification: Sustainability assessment of mini-hybrid off-grid technological systems in the African context. Renewable Energy, 35(1): 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.03.028

Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., and Chidzero, B., 1987. Our common future. In New York.

Demirtas, O., 2013. Evaluating the best renewable energy technology for sustainable energy planning. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 3: 23–33.

Dhital, R. P., Bajracharya, T. R., and Shrestha, R., 2018. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Sustainability of Renewable Energy System of Nepal. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 8(3): 69–81.

Dhital, R. P., Parajuli, B., Bajracharya, T. R., and Sthrestha, R., 2016. Sustainability Assessment of Rural Solar PV Water Pumping System in Nepal. (October). Retrieved from http://conference.ioe.edu.np/conf2014Papers/IOE-CONF-2014-43.pdf

Dhital, R. P., Pyakurel, P., Bajracharya, T. R., and Shrestha, R., 2014. Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects in Nepal. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v6i1.250

ESMAP, 2017. State of Electricity Access Rep ort (SEAR). Retrieved from http://esmap.org/SEAR/

Feron, S., 2016. Sustainability of off-grid photovoltaic systems for rural electrification in developing countries: A review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(12):1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121326

Feron, S., Heinrichs, H., and Cordero, R. R., 2016a. Are the rural electrification efforts in the Ecuadorian Amazon sustainable? Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(5): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050443

Feron, S., Heinrichs, H., and Cordero, R. R., 2016b. Sustainability of rural electrification programs based on off-grid photovoltaic (PV) systems in Chile. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0098-4

Goepel, K. D., 2018. Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3): 469–487.

Haddad, B., Liazid, A., and Ferreira, P., 2017. A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renewable Energy, 107: 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.035

Haralambopoulos, D. A., and Polatidis, H., 2003. Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Renewable Energy, 28(6): 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(02)00072-1

Hong, G. W., and Abe, N., 2012. Sustainability assessment of renewable energy projects for off-grid rural electrification: The Pangan-an Island case in the Philippines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1): 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.136

IAEA, 2005. Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development : Guidelines and Methodologies. Vienna.

Ilskog, E., 2008. Indicators for assessment of rural electrification-An approach for the comparison of apples and pears. Energy Policy, 36(7): 2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.023

IPCC, 2011. IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation.

Kaya, T., and Kahraman, C., 2010. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy, 35(6): 2517–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051

Kruger, P., 2006. Alternative energy resources: the quest for sustainable energy. Wiley Hoboken.

Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., and Bansal, R. C., 2017. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69: 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191

Liu, G., Baniyounes, A. M., Rasul, M. G., Amanullah, M. T. O., and Khan, M. M. K., 2013. General sustainability indicator of renewable energy system based on grey relational analysis. International Journal of Energy Research, 37(14): 1928–1936.

Mahapatra, S., and Dasappa, S., 2012. Rural electrification: Optimising the choice between decentralised renewable energy sources and grid extension. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(2): 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.01.006

Mainali, B., Pachauri, S., Rao, N. D., and Silveira, S., 2014. Assessing rural energy sustainability in developing countries. Energy for Sustainable Development, 19: 15–28.

Mainali, B., and Silveira, S., 2015. Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018

Mamlook, R., Akash, B. A., and Mohsen, M. S., 2001. A neuro-fuzzy program approach for evaluating electric power generation systems. Energy, 26(6): 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00015-9

Nouni, M. R., Mullick, S. C., and Kandpal, T. C., 2008. Providing electricity access to remote areas in India: An approach towards identifying potential areas for decentralized electricity supply. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(5): 1187–1220.

NPC, 2017. National Report on the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Kathmandu: GoN, National Planning Commissioning.

Onat, N., and Bayar, H., 2010. The sustainability indicators of power production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9): 3108–3115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.022

PwC, 2016. Electricity beyond the grid: Accelerating access to sustainable power for all. PwC Global Power and Utilities, 1–24.

Saaty, R. W., 1987. The Analytical Hierarchy Process- What and Why it is Used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3): 161–176.

Saaty, T. L., 1986. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7): 841–855.

Saaty, T. L., 1994. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24(6): 19–43.

Saaty T.L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Sapkota, P., Pokharel, M., and Pandey, M., 2016. Identifying the most suitable sustainable energy system for Nepal usind analytical hierarchy process. 8(2): 353–371. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v8i2.411

Sastresa, E. L., Usón, A. A., Bribián, I. Z., and Scarpellini, S., 2010. Local impact of renewables on employment: assessment methodology and case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2): 679–690.

Schnitzer, D., Deepa, S., Carvalo, J. P., Ranjit, D., Jay, A., and Daniel, K., 2014. Microgrids for Rural Electrification : A critical review of best practices based on seven case studies Microgrids for Rural Electrification : A critical review of best practices. United Nations Foundation, 122. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1399.9600

Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Shiraz, S. E., Gezder, V., and Şengül, A. B., 2015. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 75: 617–625.

Singh, R. P., and Nachtnebel, H. P., 2016. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.138

Soma, K., 2003. How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management—a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago. Marine Policy, 27(1): 47–58.

Thapa, RB; Upreti, B.; Devkota, D.; Pokharel, G., 2019. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) application for identifying the best renewable energy system for rural electrification in Nepal. In 2nd Latin American Workshop on Energy Transition- Addressing Sustainable Development.

Thapa, R. B., 2018. Sustainability of Renewable Energy Systems (RES) in Nepal. Retrieved March 20, 2019, from Web Page website: https://sustainabilityres.home.blog/informed-consent-form/

UNDP, 2007. Indicators for sustainable development. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development 2007.

UNDP, 2014. Discussion Paper, Integrated sustainable rural development: renewable energy electrification and rural productivity zones.

Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., and Zhao, J. H., 2009. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9): 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

WB, 2015. Nepal: Scaling Up Electricity Access through Mini and Micro Hydropower Applications: A strategic stock-taking and developing a future roadmap. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/650931468288599171/pdf/96844-REVISED-v1-Micro-Hydro-Report-0625-2015-Final.pdf

Williams, N. J., Jaramillo, P., Taneja, J., and Ustun, T. S., 2015. Enabling private sector investment in microgrid-based rural electrification in developing countries: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52: 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.153

Zen, A. C., Lima, A., Bianchi, A. L., and Babot, L., 2016. Sustainability, Energy and Development: A Proposal of Indicators. International Journal for Infonomics, 5(1/2): 537–541. https://doi.org/10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2012.0060.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/jars.v4i1.2097

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Asian Rural Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


website hit counters