THE COMPLEX DYNAMICS OF LAND IN MIGRANT LABOUR SOCIETIES: WHO NEEDS LAND FOR AGRICULTURE?

Vusilizwe Thebe

Abstract


The agricultural modernisation narrative has been a central assumption of rural development since the mid-twentieth century, and more recently, the land reforms currently underway in Southern Africa. The narrative emphasises the viable use of land, defined in this case through agricultural productivity and market oriented production. The main contention of this paper is that such a focus undermines the rural socio-economic structure inherent in certain rural societies, which emerge through negotiations and compromises as societies change. It draws on data from studies in Lesotho and rural Zimbabwe that shows that rural households do not only hold land for agricultural purposes, but would hold onto land for security beyond mere agriculture production. It particularly emphasises the complex relationship between households and land, complex land needs and landholding patterns. As way of conclusion, it cautions against enforcing a peasant path on rural society through agriculture-based interventions.


Keywords


agriculture; land; Lesotho; migrant labour societies; Zimbabwe

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, J., McGregor, J. & Ranger, T. (2000). Violence and memory: One hundred years in the ‘dark forests” of Matabeleland. Oxford: James Currey.

Andersson, J. (2007). How much did property rights matter? Understanding food insecurity in Zimbabwe: A critique of Richarson. African Affairs, 106(425), 681–90.

Byres, T. J. (2004). Introduction: Contextualizing and interrogating the GKI case for redistributive land reform. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1&2), 1–16.

Bernstein, H. (2004). ‘Changing before our very eyes’: Agrarian question and the politics of land in capitalism today.Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1&2), 190–225.

Boehm, C. (2003). The social life of fields: Labour markets and agrarian change in Lesotho. Paideusis: Journal for Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Studies, 3, 1–20.

Bush, R. & Cliffe, L. (1984). Agrarian policy in migrant labour societies: Reform or transformation in Zimbabwe? Review of African Political Economy, 11, 77–94

Cordell, D. D., Gregory, J. W. & Piché, V. (1996). Hoe and wage. A social history of a circular migration system in west Africa. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Coudere, H. & Marijsse, S. (1988). Rich and poor in Mutoko Communal Area. Zimbabwe Journal of Economics, 2(l), l–25.

Deininger, K. & Binswanger, H. (1999). The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experience, and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2), 247–276.

Griffin, K., Rahman, A.Z. & Ickowitz, A. (2002). Poverty and the distribution of land. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2(3), 279–330.

Hughes A.J.B. (1974). Development in Rhodesian Tribal Areas. Salisbury: Tribal Areas of Rhodesia Research Foundation.

Leduka, R.C. (2004). Explaining informal land delivery systems and institutions in African cities: Conceptual framework and emerging evidence. Paper presented at a workshop on The perpetuating challenge of informal settlements. University of the Witwatersrand, 8–10 November.

Mohamed-Katerere, J. (2003). Participatory natural resources management in the communal lands of Zimbabwe: What role for customary law? African Studies Quarterly, 5(3), 115–128.

Moyo, S. (2000). The Political economy of land acquisition and redistribution in Zimbabwe, 1990–1999. Journal of Southern African Studies, 26(1), 5–28.

Murray, C. (1981). Families divided. The impact of migrant labour in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nyambara, P.S. (2001). Immigrants, “traditional” leaders and the Rhodesian state: The power of “communal” land tenure and the politics of land acquisition in Gokwe, Zimbabwe, 1963–1979. Journal of Southern African Studies, 27(4), 771–91

O’Flaherty, M. (1998). Communal tenure in Zimbabwe: Divergent models of collective landholding in the communal areas. Africa, 68(4), 537–557.

Potts, D. (2000). Worker-peasants and farmer-housewives in Africa: The debate about 'committed' farmers, access to land and agricultural production. Journal of Southern African Studies, 26(4), 807–32.

Potts, D. & Mutambirwa, C. (1990). Rural-urban linkages in contemporary Harare: Why migrants need their land. Journal of Southern African Studies, 16(4), 677–698.

Pule, N.W. & Thabane, M. (2004). Lesotho’s land tenure regimes: Experiences of rural communities and calls for land reform. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(2), 283–303.

Quinlan, T.K.C. (1983). Transformation of land tenure in Lesotho. MA Dissertation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.

Shipton, P. & Goheen, M. (1992). Understanding African landholdings: Power, wealth and meaning. Africa, 62(3), 307–325.

Thebe, V. (2012). ‘New realities’ and tenure reforms: land-use in worker-peasant communities of south-western Zimbabwe (1940s–2006). Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 30(1), 99–117.

Thebe, V. (2017).Legacies of ‘madiro’? Worker-peasantry, livelihood crisis and ‘siziphile’ land occupations in semi-arid north-western Zimbabwe. Journal of Modern African Studies, 55(2), 2001–224.

Weiner, D. & Harris, T. (1991). Agricultural development in Zimbabwe: Transition in a labour reserve economy, in A. Seidman, K.W.C. Na Mwanza, N. Simelane and D. Weiner (eds.) (eds). Rethinking agricultural transformation in Southern Africa. Africa World Press, Trenton.

Weinrich, A.K.H. (1975). African farmers in Rhodesia: Old and new peasant communities in Karangaland. London: Oxford University Press.

Whitehead, A. & Tsikata, D. (2003). Policy discourses on women’s land rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The implications of the re-turn to the customary. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1&2), 67–112.

UN-HABITAT. (2005). Land tenure, housing rights and gender in Lesotho. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-HABITAT).

van der Ploeg, J. (2008). The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.

Yudelman, M. (1964). Africans on the land. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



website hit counters