ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING CULTURE AS MODERATOR ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of organizational learning culture as moderator on the relationship between transformational leadership and affective commitment. Framework in this study use Social Exchange Theory to explain the moderation effect and we argue that the relationship between transformational leadership and affective commitment is strengthened by organizational learning culture. Data were collected by administering questionnaires to the respondents using both offline and online survey on employees from startup companies in Indonesia (N = 73). This study using self-report method and data were analyzed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro on SPSS software. Results showed that organizational learning culture moderated the relationship between transformational leadership and affective commitment, such that the relationship was increased when organizational learning culture was high than when organizational learning culture was low. Moreover, theoretical and practical implications are given to improvement of employees’ affective commitment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbasi, E., Zamani-Miandashti, N., Abbasi, E., & Zamani-Miandashti, N. (2013). The role of transformational leadership, organizational culture and organizational learning in improving the performance of Iranian agricultural faculties. High Education, 66, 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9618-8
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Ashikali, T., & Groeneveld, S. (2015). Diversity management in public organizations and its effect on employees’ affective commitment: The role of transformational leadership and the inclusiveness of the organizational culture. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35, 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13511088
Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior J. Organiz. Behav, 25, 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.283
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
Bentler, P. (1990). Quantitative methods in psychology: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/614296051/fulltextPDF/812BB1058BD74A66PQ/8?accountid=14744
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group and Organization Management, 27, 324–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027003002
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., Maccallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
Gulluce, A. Ç., Kaygin, E., Kafadar, S. B., & Atay, M. (2016). The Relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: A study on the bank employees. Journal of Service Science and Management, 09, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2016.93033
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2008). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Islam, T., Khan, S. ur R., Ahmad, U. N. U., & Ahmed, I. (2014). Exploring the relationship between POS, OLC, job satisfaction and OCB. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.678
Islam, T., Khan, S. ur R., Ahmad, U. N. U. B., & Ahmed, I. (2013). Organizational learning culture and leader-member exchange quality: The way to enhance organizational commitment and reduce turnover intentions. Learning Organization, 20, 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-12-2012-0079
Jo, S. J., & Joo, B. K. (Brian). (2011). Knowledge sharing: The influences of learning organization culture, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811405208
Khatibi, A., Asadi, H., & Hamidi, M. (2009). The relationship between job stress and organizational commitment in national olympic and paralympic academy. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 2, 272–278.
Khunsoonthornkit, A., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2018). Structural equation model to assess the impact of learning organization and commitment on the performance of research organizations. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.003
Kim, H. (2014). Transformational leadership, organizational clan culture, organizational affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior: A case of South Korea’s public sector. Public Organization Review, 14, 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0225-z
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303251341
Memon, M. A., Cheah, J.-H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2019). Moderation analysis: Issues and guidelines. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), i–xi. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.3(1)01
Mercurio, Z. A. (2015). Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315603612
Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolt. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 515–537.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
Namazi, M., & Namazi, N.-R. (2016). Conceptual analysis of moderator and mediator variables in business research. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30064-8
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Porter, J. A. (2015). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment in nonprofit long term care organizations: The direct care worker perspective. Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership, 1, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.17062/cjil.v1i2.13
Pradhan, S., & Pradhan, R. K. (2015). An empirical investigation of relationship among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment and contextual performance. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 19, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915597089
Radian, N. N., & Mangundjaya, W. L. (2019). Individual readiness for change as mediator between transformational leadership and commitment affective to change. Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.12962/j26151847.v3i1.5158
Ramachandran, S., & Krishnan, V. R. (2009). Effect of transformational leadership on followers’ affective and normative commitment: Culture as moderator. Great Lakes Herald, 3, 23–38.
Sekliuckiene, J., Vaitkiene, R., & Vainauskiene, V. (2018). Organisational learning in startup development and international growth. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(4), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060407
Sharma, P., & Sinha, V. (2015). The influence of occupational rank on organizational commitment of faculty members. Management - Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 20(2), 71–91.
Triana, M. D. C., Richard, O. C., & Yücel, İ. (2017). Status incongruence and supervisor gender as moderators of the transformational leadership to subordinate affective organizational commitment relationship. Personnel Psychology, 70, 429–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12154
Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 31–55. Retrieved from http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/21929.pdf%0Ahttp://eds.a.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=0c2eab39-43d5-4646-b07a-e8c5a2a7d324%40sessionmgr4008&vid=5&hid=4205
Yew, L. T. (2008). Job satisfaction and affective commitment: A study of employees in the tourism industry in Sarawak, Malaysia. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2008.016210
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26487/hebr.v5i1.2722
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Luthfia Putri Rizki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
______________________________________________________________________
Indexing and Abstracting: