DEFINING THE ROOT CAUSE OF JAKARTA MBA STUDENTS’ COMPLAINT USING 5-C TQM MODEL OF ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE

Karta Negara Salam, Sri Wijaya Salam

Abstract


In the competitive world of education, there are many universities competing to improve the quality of education services, employee performance, and produce graduates with integrity and professional skills. One of them is SBM ITB Jakarta which is the location for the research. The purpose of this study was to determine the root causes of the quality of MBA ITB Jakarta services by using a qualitative approach and “5C TQM of academic excellence” model as a guideline to improve the quality of education services. While for the technique of collecting data and analyzing qualitative data using interviews with respondents, the respondents in the study were university staff, lecturers, SBM ITB Jakarta management, and students. The results of the study concluded that there absence of such clear role from every unit involved (in this case SBM ITB Jakarta staff, lecturers, and management) as the root cause of student complaints related to the service quality of SBM ITB Jakarta. Miscommunication and misperception cannot be avoided because every unit has different perceptions and expectations toward each other.


Keywords


Keywords : TQM Model, MBA Students, Academic, Excellence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brotzen, D. 1999. The role of reputation in crisis management.London: Limited by Director Publication Ltd.

Choon Ling Kwek, Teck Chai Lau, Hoi Piew Tan, (2010) International Journal of Business and Management: Education Quality Process Model and Its Influence on Students' Perceived Service Quality, 5(8), 154-176.

CSR Magazine. 2004. Reputation defined.http://www.csreurope.org/news/reputationdefined (accessed June 16, 2011).

IvanovichAgusta, (2009), TeknikPengumpulandanAnalisisData Kualitatifhttp://ivanagusta.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/ivan-pengumpulan-analisis-data-kualitatif.pdf.Accessed: 25 June, 2011.

Lovelock, C., &Wirtz, J. 2004, Service Marketing; People, technology, Strategy (7th ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Parasuraman, A., Zeitharnl, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1988). Communicationand Control Processes in the Delivery of Service.

Sakthivel,P.B., Rajendran.G., Raju.R. (2005). TQM implementation and students' satisfaction of academic performance.The TQM Magazine. 17(6); 573-590.

RajdeepSinghet.al. (2010), International Journal of EngineeringScience and Technology: SERVQUAL and Model of Service QualityGaps:A Framework for Determining and Prioritizing Critical Factors from Faculty Perspective in Higher Education. Vol. 2 (7), 3297-3304.

Russell, M. (2005). Marketing education: a review of service quality perceptions among international students. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17(1), 65-77.

Schreiber, E.S., (2008),TheMcMasterJournalof Communication: Reputation, 6(1).

Sekaran U, 2003, “Research Methods for Business” John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

TurgutKarak, (2008) Reputation Management in Educational Organizations: Suggestion of a New Model.6(1).

www.sbm.itb.ac.id/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26487/hebr.v3i2.2009

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Karta Negara Salam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________

Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review (ISSN Print: 2549-3221 | ISSN Online: 2549-323X ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Preserved in LOCKSS, based at Stanford University Libraries, United Kingdom, through PKP Private LOCKSS Network program.

 

Indexing and Abstracting: