Keywords
Checks and Balances
Constitutional Court
Dispute Resolution
How to Cite
Abstract
The distribution of authority among state institutions is a fundamental component of any governmental framework, as it helps prevent jurisdictional overlaps that could lead to institutional conflicts. When such conflicts over authority do occur, it becomes imperative to have a mechanism in place for their resolution. This study is designed to explore and analyze the comparative regulatory structures for resolving authority disputes among state institutions, as outlined by the legislation in Indonesia, the United States, Germany, and Canada. Furthermore, the research aims to identify the characteristics of disputes concerning state institutional authority and suggest optimal regulatory solutions for their resolution. Utilizing a qualitative and descriptive research approach, this study will clarify the regulatory frameworks for dispute resolution among state institutions, as defined by the current legislation in each country. Each framework is characterized by unique institutions and methods for resolving disputes. The findings reveal that the German Constitutional Court holds the most comprehensive jurisdiction, covering all state institutions in Germany, both at the central and regional levels. In terms of procedural aspects, the legal framework for resolving authority disputes in Germany is more detailed than those in Indonesia, the United States, or Canada, thereby promoting greater transparency and accountability in the dispute resolution process in Germany.References
Adrianus Bawamenewi, 2020, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara, Jurnal Warta Edisi 63, Vol 14, No.1.
Alfiano I. Suak, et al, Tinjauan Normatif Eksitensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Meneyelesaikan Sengketa Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Negara, Lex Administratum, Vol. 9, No. 4.
Andi Safriani, 2019, Mahkamah Konstitusi di Beberapa Negara Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum, Jurnal Al-Qadau, Vol. 6, No. 1.
Romi Librayanto, 2008, Trias Politica Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, PUKAP, Makasar.
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. "Penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi." Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2010): 1-48.
Femmie Cynthia, 2022, Analisis Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara, Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol. 05, No. 01.
Hannah Arendt, Jacques Rancière and Chantal Mouffe Av, 2012, Three Concepts of The Political – A Comparative Study of The Political in the Works of Södertörns högskola. Institutionen för kultur och kommunikation: D-uppsats.
Harjono, 2009, Transformasi dan Demokrasi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta.
Irwansyah, 2020, Penelitian Hukum, Mirra Buana Media, Yogyakarta.
I Dewa Gede Palguna, 2008, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Judicial Review, dan Welfare State, Kumpulan Pemikiran I Dewa Gede Palguna, Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MK RI, Jakarta.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
---------------------------2005, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia, Penerbit Konpress, Jakarta.
Kelik Iswandi, dan Nanik Prasetyoningsih, 2020, Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Independen di Indonesia, Sasi, Vol. 26 No. 04.
Mansur Marzuki, 2011, Telaah Kritis Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara, Jurnal Konstitusi PSHK-FH Universitas Islam Indonesia, Vol. IV, No. 1.
Sri Hastuti Puspitasari, 2014, Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara sebagai Salah Satu Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 21, No. 3.
Triyanti, Ninuk, I. Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, and Lego Karjoko. "Legal Gaps in Personal Data Protection: Reforming Indonesia’s Population Administration Law." Hasanuddin Law Review 11, no. 1 (2025): 132-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v11i1.6177
Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi (Constitutional Court Procedural Law Drafting Team), 2010, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Willian Cranch, 1807, Supreme Court Of the United States, Isaac Riley, New York.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Hasanuddin Law Review