Classification of Industrial Relations Disputes Settlement in Indonesia: Is it Necessary?

Desak Putu Dewi Kasih, Made Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, Putri Triari Dwijayanthi, Dewa Ayu Dian Sawitri, Alvyn Chaisar Perwira Nanggala Pratama

Abstract


This study aimed to examine the effect of the disputes classification in the industrial settlement system, comparing arrangements according to the perspective of the International Labor Organization, China, Japan, and Kazakhstan, and trying to find the ideal concept of the type of industrial dispute to apply in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research. The approaches used in this study were the statutory approach, conceptual approach, fact approach, and comparative approach. The results revealed that the classification of disputes in the industrial relations settlement system in Indonesia has an impact on the difficulty of the parties in classifying their disputes. Comparative studies were conducted to determine the classification of disputes in international law as well as in China, Japan, and Kazakhstan. The ideal concept that can be offered to Indonesia is the simplification or elimination of the classification of industrial relations to provide dispute resolution by applying the principles of fast, precise, fair, and inexpensive methods.  


Keywords


Classification; Industrial Relation; Dispute Settlement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beissenova, A., Z. H. Nurbekova, Z. Zhanazarova, Y. Dzyurenich, and A. Turebayeva. "Labour conflicts in Kazakhstan: A specific character of their solution." Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 82 (2013): 877-881.

Brown, Ronald C. "Comparative alternative dispute resolution for individual labor disputes in Japan, China, and the United States: Lessons from Asia." John's L. Rev. 86 (2012): 543.

Chung Sun Wook, “Industrial Relations (IR) Changes in China: A Foreign Employer’s Perspective,” Employee Relations 38, no. 6 (January 1, 2016): 826–40, https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2015-0120.

Guzal Galiakbarova et al., “Legal Analysis of Individual Labor Disputes in the Republic of Kazakhstan,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9, no. 14 (2016): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i14/91074.

Haikal Arsalan and Dinda Silviana Putri, “Reformasi Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial,” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (2020): 39, https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.39-50.

International Labour Office, “Collective Dispute Resolution through Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration : European and ILO Perspectives International Labour Office,” 2007.

Jiaojiao Feng and Pengxin Xie, “Is Mediation the Preferred Procedure in Labour Dispute Resolution Systems? Evidence from Employer–Employee Matched Data in China,” Journal of Industrial Relations 62, no. 1 (2020): 81–103, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619834971.

Karen Petroski, “Legal Fictions and the Limits of Legal Language,” International Journal of Law in Context 9, no. 4 (December 2013): 485–505, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552313000268.

Maskun et al., “Arbitration: Understanding It in Theory and Indonesian Practice,” Hasanuddin Law Review 5, no. 2 (2019): 220–34, https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v5i2.1945

Megumi Honami, “How Successful Is Japan’s Labor Tribunal System?: The Labor Tribunal ’ s Limited Scope and Effectiveness,” Law, Asian-Pacific Journal, Policy 16, no. 1 (2007): 83–100.

Muhammad Ishar Helmi and Riko Hendra Pilo, “Independensi Hakim Ad-Hoc Pada Lingkungan Peradilan Hubungan Industrial,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 2 (July 2017): 233,

Nafay Choudhury, “Revisiting Critical Legal Pluralism: Normative Contestations in the Afghan Courtroom,” Asian Journal of Law and Society 4, no. 1 (2017): 229–55, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.2.

Oduniyi, Oreoluwa Omotayo. "Workers’ Protection in the Covid-19 Era in Nigeria." Padjadjaran Journal of Law 8, no. 2 (2021): 289-308.

Okene, O. V. C., and C. T. Emejuru. "The Disputes of Rights Versus Disputes of Interests' Dichotomy in Labour Law: The Case of Nigerian Labour Law." JL Pol'y & Globalization 35 (2015): 135.

Ryuichi Yamakawa, “The Labor Dispute Resolution System in Japan: Recent Developments, Their Background and Future Prospects” 168 (n.d.).

Singadimeja, Holyness, Atip Latipulhayat, and M. Nurdin Singadimeja. "Freedom of Association Implementation through Legal Protection for Worker Union in Response to Anti-Union Actions by Employers." Padjadjaran Journal of Law 6, no. 3 (2019): 533-555.

Suwiryo, Broto. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan: Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan. Surabaya: LaksBang Pressindo, 2017.

Wei Chi, Yueting Ji, and Wei Huang, “Mediation and Conciliation in Collective Labor Conflicts in China,” 2019, 265–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92531-8_17.

Zhanna Khamzina et al., “Labor Disputes in Kazakhstan: Results of Legal Regulation and Future Prospects,” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 23, no. 1 (2020): 1–14.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i1.3502

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Hasanuddin Law Review (ISSN Online: 2442-9899 | ISSN Print: 2442-9880) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Preserved in LOCKSS, based at Stanford University Libraries, United Kingdom, through PKP Private LOCKSS Network program.
 
Indexing and Abstracting:
 
  
 
View full indexing services.